🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart atomic negotiations with the United States as long as it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat declared solely negotiations worked, and revealed new appeals had been made by intermediaries to restart talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the global atomic watchdog to access struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Route

Araghchi is walking a complex route since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a stance of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged stronger militarily and mentally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Prior Discussions Unexpectedly Terminated

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that concluded with the American leader declaring the locations had been obliterated. Following this, European countries used their authority to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Offered

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was decided an local partnership with American involvement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the talks that American atomic experts could operate inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Diplomats claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Iranian officials said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be resurrected in some form if talks resume.

The US president in recent days claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but in private Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving clear proposals from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his speech to the conference, aimed to depict the US as a controlling nation that exploits the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the attacks commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Remains the Ultimate Solution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had consistently sought to impose their desires during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be alive and continues the final answer to settle disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and respect, they will receive a reply in the same approach."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He stated: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The sites and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but failed to shatter. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more united, and more backing of the administration and the state in the wake of this invasion."